LRP-183
C+(65/100)
Developing

Hearts and Hands — What Is the ROI of ADRA Programs on Local Church Growth?

What is the ROI of Adventist Development and Relief Agency (ADRA) programs on local church growth?

Sources12
Words1,632
Confidencelimited
Updated03-Mar-2026
ADRAhumanitarianchurch-growthROIdevelopmentmissionGlobalInter-AmericaAfricaAsia

Executive Summary

The Adventist Development and Relief Agency (ADRA), with $120.7 million in total revenue in 2024, operates 422+ projects across 96 countries, benefiting nearly 20 million people during the COVID-19 pandemic alone. Despite this massive humanitarian footprint, the direct return on investment (ROI) in terms of local church growth remains essentially unmeasured. No publicly available study systematically correlates ADRA program locations with membership accession rates. ADRA's mandate as a professional humanitarian agency — often government-funded and bound by non-proselytizing agreements — creates a structural tension with direct evangelistic goals. However, ADRA Inter-America's 2026 strategic plan explicitly aims for deeper integration between ADRA and local congregations, suggesting growing institutional recognition that the humanitarian-evangelistic gap needs bridging. This LRP examines the available evidence and identifies the critical research gaps.

Key Findings

1

ADRA's 2024 revenue of $120.7 million supports over 422 projects across 96 countries, yet the direct return on investment for local church growth remains unmeasured.

2

No publicly available study currently correlates ADRA program locations with membership accession rates to quantify evangelistic impact.

3

ADRA's mandate as a professional humanitarian agency often creates structural tension with direct evangelistic goals due to non-proselytizing agreements.

4

ADRA Inter-America's 2026 strategic plan explicitly aims for deeper integration between the agency and local congregations to address the humanitarian-evangelistic gap.

1 more finding in this research

Sign in to read the full research paper

Quality Breakdown

Source Quality
13/20
Source Diversity
10/15
Geographic Scope
9/10
Evidence Density
11/15
Methodology
6/15
Gap Honesty
9/10
Competing Views
4/10
Recency
3/5

References

12 sources cited in this research

Sign in to view the full bibliography

Related Research