Living Research Projects (LRPs)

The research engine behind every AI recommendation, health score, and insight on Adventist Pulse.

194
Published LRPs
100-point
Evidence scale
7
Root Questions
B−
Internal Quality Gate

Research knowledge matrix

How LRPs answer the seven mission questions

Every Living Research Project is mapped to one or more root questions. This obsidian matrix shows the seven-question spiderweb at the centre of the Pulse research system, with live counts around it so leaders can see where evidence is strong and where more understanding is still needed.

Published LRPs
194
Root questions
7
Matrix purpose
Mission clarity
Question spiderweb
7
Root questions

The Pulse research engine keeps all seven mission questions visible at once, so evidence serves mission rather than fragmenting it.

R1

Mission Effectiveness

Linked
25

Are we fulfilling the Great Commission? Are people being reached, discipled, and retained?

R2

Institutional Stewardship

Linked
15

Are our structures, systems, and resources being managed faithfully and efficiently?

R3

Generational Continuity

Linked
21

Are we keeping our young people? Is faith being transmitted across generations?

R4

Spiritual Vitality

Linked
14

Are members growing spiritually? Is worship meaningful? Is discipleship deepening?

R5

Global Mission Sustainability

Linked
9

Can the church sustain and expand its global mission? Are growth patterns healthy worldwide?

R6

Leadership & Governance

Linked
10

Are leaders being developed? Is governance transparent, participatory, and effective?

R7

Adaptive Capacity

Linked
25

Can the church adapt to changing contexts without losing its identity and mission?

Why this matters

This is the operating map of Pulse research. Each project strengthens one or more mission questions, which means pastors, members, and conference leaders can trace recommendations back to the actual evidence architecture underneath them.

R1

25

Mission Effectiveness

reach, discipleship, retention

R2

15

Institutional Stewardship

systems, resources, faithfulness

R3

21

Generational Continuity

young people, transmission, retention

R4

14

Spiritual Vitality

worship, growth, discipleship depth

R5

9

Global Mission Sustainability

world growth, sustainability, expansion

R6

10

Leadership & Governance

trust, governance, development

R7

25

Adaptive Capacity

learning, context, identity

Browse 194 public research projects

What is an LRP?

A Living Research Project is a structured, evidence-based document that answers a specific question about church health, growth, or mission. Unlike static academic papers, LRPs are living — continuously updated as new data, studies, and field evidence emerges.

Each LRP connects to the Adventist Pulse scoring engine. When a church takes a Vitality Check, the AI generates specific, source-backed recommendations grounded in LRP evidence. But recommendations don't stop at data — they're checked against Scripture, Adventist mission, and local pastoral discernment so that Pulse supports faithful stewardship rather than replacing spiritual judgement.

Pulse Notes are a logged-in collaboration layer for approved Pulse users — field observations, source suggestions, caution flags, and local outcomes that can be reviewed before being promoted into the public research record. This keeps collaboration accountable while letting pastors, members, and conference leaders surface what is actually happening on the ground. The more each entity contributes, the more intelligence it receives back.

The 7 Root Questions

Every LRP exists to better answer one or more of these core questions about Adventist mission. Together, they define what a healthy, mission-driven church looks like.

R1Mission Effectiveness

Are we fulfilling the Great Commission? Are people being reached, discipled, and retained?

R2Institutional Stewardship

Are our structures, systems, and resources being managed faithfully and efficiently?

R3Generational Continuity

Are we keeping our young people? Is faith being transmitted across generations?

R4Spiritual Vitality

Are members growing spiritually? Is worship meaningful? Is discipleship deepening?

R5Global Mission Sustainability

Can the church sustain and expand its global mission? Are growth patterns healthy worldwide?

R6Leadership & Governance

Are leaders being developed? Is governance transparent, participatory, and effective?

R7Adaptive Capacity

Can the church adapt to changing contexts without losing its identity and mission?

Anatomy of an LRP

Core Question

Every LRP answers ONE specific, measurable question about church health or mission.

Evidence Strength

Scored 0–100 across source quality, diversity, methodology, recency, gap honesty, and competing viewpoints.

Root Questions

Maps to one or more of the 7 root questions — the fundamental questions of Adventist mission.

Evidence-Based

Every claim cites sources: peer-reviewed research, denominational data, field reports, and Pulse Notes from the community.

Worldview Review

Flags loaded terms, ideological drift, and theological risk so public copy and recommendations stay under Scripture, Adventist belief, and mission.

Adventist worldview gate

LRPs can use research tools, public data, and social science, but they are not allowed to borrow secular ideology as the interpretive frame. Each project now carries review fields for Adventist confidence, theological risk, ideological risk, flagged language, biblical-Adventist anchors, and recommendation guardrails.

Doctrine before data

Scripture, Adventist belief, and the Great Controversy worldview govern interpretation.

Mission before activism

Recommendations must translate into discipleship, evangelism, care, education, liberty, stewardship, and church order.

Context before certainty

Loaded terms require Adventist-context review before they shape public copy or high-stakes actions.

Example LRPs

LRP-001Comprehensive evidence · 86/100

The Comeback — Why Is Gen Z Returning to Church?

What factors are driving measurable increases in Gen Z church attendance after decades of decline?

R1R3youth-retentiongenerational
LRP-044Comprehensive evidence · 86/100

Cultural Diversity as Strength and Weakness

Migration growth means we're not reaching locals. How do we fix this?

R1R3R5migration-growthsecular-outreach
LRP-070Comprehensive evidence · 91/100

Composite Church Health Index

Can we build a single, defensible number that captures the health of any Adventist church?

R1R2R3R4church-healthvitality-check
LRP-181Substantive evidence · 79/100

Tithe Sharing Formula — How Money Flows Through the System

How does the Adventist tithe distribution formula actually work, and is it equitable?

R2R7tithe-flowfinancial

Evidence Strength

Every LRP carries a transparent source-strength score. The old letter grade remains an internal editorial gate, but public interpretation should focus on evidence depth, confidence, sources, cautions, and review cadence.

Source Quality
18/20
Source Diversity
14/15
Geographic Scope
12/15
Evidence Density
14/15
Methodology
8/10
Gap Honesty
8/10
Competing Views
7/10
Recency
5/5
Total Quality Score86/100 source strength

How LRPs Power the Platform

Vitality Check
27 questions
Scoring Engine
5 dimensions
LRP Matching
200+ projects
AI Insights
Cited recommendations

When a pastor runs a Vitality Check, scores flow through the engine. Low scores trigger a lookup against relevant LRPs. The AI generates specific, actionable recommendations — each one citing its source. Every recommendation backed by research that helps answer one of the 7 root questions of Adventist mission.

Adventist Pulse — The health of every Adventist entity, understood for mission stewardship.

200+ research projects · 1,229 entities · 13 world divisions · Every recommendation cited